Accuracy-budget scoping

An accuracy budget is built backward from the deliverable's tolerance: the positioning error the end product can absorb is apportioned across the receiver, the correction method and the field procedure, and that apportionment — not a datasheet headline — decides the receiver class. Survey control, engineering-grade mapping and reconnaissance-level positioning each land in a different tier, and pinning the requirement to the right one is done before a receiver is selected, not discovered when the deliverable fails to close.
The spread between those tiers is real money, so getting the tier right is where a mapping program protects its budget rather than paying for accuracy it will never use. RTK and PPK correction services are configured for the positioning method the work calls for, whether that's a base-and-rover survey or a network correction subscription.
- Accuracy budget defined from the end data product, not the receiver
- Receiver class matched to survey-control, engineering or recon positioning
- RTK/PPK correction-service configuration for survey-grade work
- Cost tradeoffs between accuracy tiers made explicit at scoping
- TAA country-of-origin documented across receivers and field devices







