Uniqcli

Capability 01

Research & Development

Prototype engineering, feasibility studies and technology maturation for program-specific requirements.

Scope
Feasibility · rapid prototyping · TRL 1–6 maturation
Deliverables
Design history file · test data · fielded BOM
Compliance
TAA-verified sourcing · NDAA §889 screened
Hands off to
Uniqcli manufacturing & OEM integration

Overview

Prototypes that survive contact with a program office

Most R&D shops hand off a working prototype and call it done. We carry the requirement through TRL maturation, documentation and sourcing so what you demo is what you can actually procure — with a bill of materials, country-of-origin data and a compliance posture already attached.

An engineer in an ESD smock leaning over a rework station, probe in hand on a prototype board.

How we work

Feasibility study to fieldable design

Every engagement starts with a feasibility study: can this be built, at what TRL, on what timeline, and with which components are available through TAA-compliant channels. We rule out dead ends before your program office commits budget to them.

From there we run rapid prototyping and design iteration in-house, then mature the design toward production — swapping any part that can't clear NDAA §889 screening or TAA sourcing before it becomes a program risk instead of a footnote.

  • Feasibility studies scoped against SOW and TRL targets
  • Rapid prototyping with iterative design reviews
  • Component sourcing pre-screened for TAA and NDAA §889
  • Technology maturation plans tied to a fielded bill of materials

The work in depth

Research & development, stage by stage

Each stage produces an artifact a program office can act on — a decision, a testable unit, a bill of materials, or a documentation package.

Feasibility & trade studies

Two engineers at a planning wall weighing sample components on a lab bench.

A feasibility study answers the questions a program office has to defend: can this be built, at what technology-readiness level does it start, on what schedule, and are the components available through TAA-compliant channels. We frame the trade space against your statement of work and TRL targets, then rule out the approaches that dead-end on cost, schedule or supply before anyone commits budget to them.

The deliverable is a decision, not a research paper — a trade-study report that names the recommended path, the parts it depends on, and the risks that still need to be bought down as the design matures.

  • Feasibility and trade-study reports mapped to TRL 1–6
  • Approaches scored against SOW, schedule and cost constraints
  • Component availability checked through TAA-compliant channels
  • Risk register carried forward into the maturation plan

Rapid prototyping & design iteration

A prototype bench with a running benchtop 3D printer, an oscilloscope and a half-built chassis.

Prototyping earns its name only if it produces something you can test. We run rapid prototyping and design iteration — breadboard to fabricated unit — with design reviews at each turn so the concept converges on a fieldable design rather than drifting.

Because sourcing runs alongside the build, a part that can't clear NDAA §889 screening or TAA country-of-origin gets swapped while it is still a design choice, not after it has become a program risk buried in the bill of materials.

  • Bench fabrication and iterative build-test-review cycles
  • Design reviews tied to measurable exit criteria
  • Non-compliant parts substituted during design, not after
  • Test results captured for the design history file

Design for manufacture & sourcing

A bare circuit board clamped under a bench microscope beside component reels at an ESD workstation.

A prototype that can't be re-sourced in production quantities is a dead end. We track every component's supply chain from the first breadboard, so the design that passes your critical design review uses parts you can actually buy at scale — not a one-off unit built from whatever was on the bench.

A design-for-manufacture review before handoff catches the assembly steps, tolerances and long-lead parts that turn a clean prototype into an expensive production run, so the build lane inherits a design that is ready to make.

  • Full supply-chain tracking from the first prototype build
  • TAA-compliant, NDAA §889-screened component selection
  • End-of-life and long-lead parts flagged before CDR
  • Design-for-manufacture review ahead of production handoff

Documentation & handoff package

A finished prototype unit in a foam-lined transit case beside a thick documentation binder.

Documentation follows the same discipline as the design. Design history files, test data and a compliance matrix travel with the design, so a downstream integrator or manufacturing partner — including our own manufacturing lane — can pick it up without reverse-engineering your intent.

The handoff package is the point: it lets the build happen under one accountable relationship, with no gap between the engineers who matured the design and the floor that produces it.

  • Design history file assembled through the program, not after
  • Test-data package and as-built bill of materials on delivery
  • Compliance matrix covering TAA and NDAA §889 posture
  • Direct handoff path into Uniqcli manufacturing and OEM integration

What's included

From lab bench to program record

  • Feasibility and trade-study reports mapped to TRL 1–6
  • Rapid prototyping with in-house fabrication and bench test
  • Design-for-manufacture review before handoff to production
  • TAA-compliant, NDAA §889-screened component selection
  • Design history file and test-data package on delivery
  • Direct handoff path into Uniqcli manufacturing and OEM integration

Brands we carry

Bench and prototyping lines we source

Test instruments, embedded compute and board-level parts we quote for R&D and prototyping work.

Frequently asked

Do you take a concept from sketch to working prototype, or only mature existing designs?

Both. We run feasibility studies from a blank sheet and we pick up designs mid-stream to mature them toward production. Either way, we scope TRL targets and a schedule before work starts.

Will the components in our prototype still be sourceable when we move to production?

That's the point of doing sourcing alongside design rather than after it. We flag any part that isn't TAA-compliant or clears NDAA §889 screening during prototyping, so the production bill of materials doesn't require a redesign.

Can R&D output feed directly into a manufacturing run?

Yes. Design history files and test data hand off directly to our manufacturing lane for build-to-spec production, with no gap in accountability between design and build.

How far up the TRL scale do you take a design?

We scope engagements across TRL 1 through 6 — from feasibility and proof-of-concept to a prototype validated in a relevant environment. Where a program needs further qualification, we mature the design into a production-ready package and hand it into our manufacturing lane rather than stopping at a lab unit.

Who owns the design data and IP that comes out of an engagement?

The design, its documentation and the resulting IP are the program's. We deliver the design history file, test data and as-built bill of materials as your record, under the data-rights terms your contract specifies.

Scope a research and development requirement

Send a technical requirement or problem statement — we'll come back with a feasibility assessment and a path to TRL maturity.