Uniqcli

Capability 09

Drone / UAS

Unmanned systems, counter-UAS, sensors and payload integration for ISR missions.

Scope
Platforms · counter-UAS · sensor & payload integration
Compliance
Blue UAS-screened · NDAA §889 · TAA-verified
Deliverables
Integrated airframe + payload, bench-tested pre-field
Built for
ISR, force protection and public-safety missions

Overview

Platforms and payloads, screened before they're a compliance problem

Federal UAS procurement lives or dies on NDAA §889 and Blue UAS status — a capable airframe from a covered manufacturer is a non-starter regardless of performance. Uniqcli sources unmanned platforms, counter-UAS systems and mission payloads with that screening done up front, then integrates sensors and payloads to the mission profile.

A technician seating an electro-optical gimbal onto the belly of a multirotor at a lit bench.

How we work

Platform, payload and mission, matched

We scope the platform against the mission first — endurance, payload capacity, launch-and-recovery method — and cross-check candidate airframes against the DoD Blue UAS list and NDAA §889 covered-equipment restrictions before a platform is quoted.

Sensor and payload integration — EO/IR gimbals, SIGINT payloads, communications relays — is bench-tested for power budget, data-link bandwidth and physical mounting before it's paired with the airframe, so the integrated system flies as designed on the first mission, not the third attempt.

  • Platform sourcing screened against Blue UAS list and NDAA §889
  • Counter-UAS system sourcing and integration
  • EO/IR, SIGINT and comms-relay payload integration
  • Bench-tested power, data-link and mounting compatibility before fielding

In depth

UAS sourcing and integration, end to end

Platform sourcing & compliance screening

A receiving-and-screening bay with generic airframes staged on steel racks and a technician checking a tablet.

The screen that governs the whole procurement happens before performance is even weighed: each candidate airframe is checked against the current DoD Blue UAS list and the manufacturer against the NDAA §889 covered-equipment restrictions, because a covered platform is ineligible no matter how well it flies. Mission fit is scoped in parallel — endurance, payload weight, launch-and-recovery method and transport footprint — so the airframes that reach a quote are the ones that both clear the compliance gate and match the mission.

Where a preferred airframe can't clear those gates, we flag it during scoping and put compliant alternatives on the table, so the eligibility problem surfaces on paper rather than at delivery. TAA country-of-origin is documented per lot on all non-restricted components.

  • Mission-first platform scoping: endurance, payload, launch/recovery, transport
  • Candidate airframes screened against the DoD Blue UAS list
  • NDAA §889 covered-manufacturer screening before quote
  • Compliant alternatives proposed when a preferred airframe can't clear
  • TAA country-of-origin documented per lot (FAR 52.225-5)

Sensor & payload integration

A gimbal payload on a test fixture wired to a data-link module on an integration bench.

Sensor and payload integration is where a spec sheet meets physics. EO/IR gimbals, SIGINT payloads and communications relays are bench-tested for power budget, data-link bandwidth and physical mounting before they are paired with an airframe, so the integrated system performs as designed on the first mission rather than the third attempt.

For ISR work, payload selection is driven by the mission's data products, not the sensor's headline resolution: frame rate and resolution matter less than whether the data link can move that payload's output to the ground station in the time the mission allows. We size the link budget and the payload together.

  • EO/IR, SIGINT and comms-relay payload integration
  • Power-budget, data-link-bandwidth and mounting validation on the bench
  • Link budget sized against the mission's data-product deadline
  • Third-party payloads integrated onto airframes you already field
  • Integrated system validated before it leaves for the field

Counter-UAS systems

A fixed-site sensor mast carrying radar and tracker heads with cabling dropping to a shelter rack.

Counter-UAS is a detect-track-defeat problem, not a single product purchase. RF detection, radar and EO/IR tracking each carry coverage and false-alarm tradeoffs that depend on your site's RF environment and airspace class, so we scope the detection layer against an actual site survey before recommending a defeat method.

The result is a system sized to the threat you are likely to see, not a vendor's default configuration — and one whose sensors, effectors and command console are integrated and tested together rather than bought as disconnected boxes.

  • Site survey of RF environment and airspace class first
  • Detection layer scoped across RF, radar and EO/IR tradeoffs
  • Defeat method matched to the surveyed threat profile
  • Sensors, effectors and command console integrated and tested together
  • Fixed-site and on-the-move configurations

Ground control & field kitting

A kitting area with identical operator kits of cases, folded antennas and battery banks laid in a row.

A fielded system is only as ready as the kit around it. We integrate ground-control stations with the platform and payload, provision spares and consumables, and build transit-ready operator kits so a crew can launch on arrival rather than assemble on site.

Cases, antennas, batteries and field-power are specified for the environment the crew actually works in — dust, moisture, drop risk and long days off-grid — and standardized across kits so multiple teams field the same configuration.

  • Ground-control-station integration with platform and payload
  • Transit-ready operator kits, spares and consumables
  • Ruggedized cases, antennas and field-power sized to the environment
  • Standardized configurations across multiple crews
  • Bench-verified before hand-off

What's included

Mission-matched, compliance-screened

  • Platform sourcing cross-checked against Blue UAS list and NDAA §889
  • Counter-UAS detect-track-defeat system scoping and integration
  • EO/IR, SIGINT and communications-relay payload integration
  • Data-link and power-budget compatibility testing pre-fielding
  • Ground-control-station integration and operator kitting
  • TAA-compliant sourcing on all non-restricted components

Brands we carry

Field-kit and ground-segment brands

The airframe is one line item — the kit that fields it draws on the ruggedized brands we stock.

Frequently asked

Can you confirm a platform is Blue UAS-listed before we commit budget?

Yes. We check candidate airframes against the current DoD Blue UAS list and NDAA §889 covered-equipment restrictions during scoping, before a platform is quoted.

Do you integrate third-party sensors onto a platform we already own?

Yes. We can bench-test and integrate EO/IR, SIGINT or comms-relay payloads onto an existing airframe, validating power and data-link compatibility before fielding.

How do you scope a counter-UAS system for our site?

We start with a site survey of your RF environment and airspace class, then size the detection layer (RF, radar, EO/IR) and defeat method to the threat profile that survey identifies.

Do you operate the aircraft or fly the missions for us?

No. We supply and integrate UAS hardware, sensors and counter-UAS equipment; we do not operate aircraft, hold FAA certificates or fly missions on a customer's behalf. Flight operations stay with your qualified crews or a separate services provider.

What happens if the airframe we want turns out to be §889-covered?

We flag it during scoping, before anything is quoted, and put compliant alternatives on the table with the tradeoffs called out. The eligibility problem surfaces on paper — not at delivery, where it becomes a program risk.

Scope a UAS or counter-UAS requirement

Send a mission profile or site survey — we'll come back with a platform, payload and compliance assessment.